Multiple-Choice Questions or Short-Answer Tests?
Sushma Nagsen Ramraje, P L Sable
Abstract
Background
People forget much of what they learn, therefore students could benefit from learning strategies that yield long-lasting knowledge. Yet surprisingly, little is known about how long-term retention is most efficiently mastered. We studied the value of teacher made in class tests as learning aids and compared two types of teacher-made tests (multiple choice and short-answer tests) with a no test (control) to determine their value as aids to retention learning.
Method
The study was conducted on two separate batches of medical undergraduate students. This study compared two types of tests [multiple choice questions (MCQs) and short answer questions (SAQs)] with a no test (control) group. The investigation involved initial testing at the end of the lecture (post instruction), followed by an unannounced delayed retention test on the same material three weeks later. The unannounced delayed test comprising of MCQs and SAQs on the same material was given three weeks later to all the three groups.
Results
In batch I, the MCQ group had a higher mean delayed retention score of 10.97, followed by the SAQ group (8.42) and the control group (6.71). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and least significance difference (LSD) post hoc test revealed statistically significant difference between the means of the three groups. Similar results were obtained for batch II
Conclusion
Classroom testing has a positive effect on retention learning; both short-answer and multiple-choice tests being more effective than no test in promoting delayed retention learning, however, multiple-choice tests are better.
Full Text:
People forget much of what they learn, therefore students could benefit from learning strategies that yield long-lasting knowledge. Yet surprisingly, little is known about how long-term retention is most efficiently mastered. We studied the value of teacher made in class tests as learning aids and compared two types of teacher-made tests (multiple choice and short-answer tests) with a no test (control) to determine their value as aids to retention learning.
Method
The study was conducted on two separate batches of medical undergraduate students. This study compared two types of tests [multiple choice questions (MCQs) and short answer questions (SAQs)] with a no test (control) group. The investigation involved initial testing at the end of the lecture (post instruction), followed by an unannounced delayed retention test on the same material three weeks later. The unannounced delayed test comprising of MCQs and SAQs on the same material was given three weeks later to all the three groups.
Results
In batch I, the MCQ group had a higher mean delayed retention score of 10.97, followed by the SAQ group (8.42) and the control group (6.71). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and least significance difference (LSD) post hoc test revealed statistically significant difference between the means of the three groups. Similar results were obtained for batch II
Conclusion
Classroom testing has a positive effect on retention learning; both short-answer and multiple-choice tests being more effective than no test in promoting delayed retention learning, however, multiple-choice tests are better.
PDF